The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: matter of convienence
matter of convienence
I think Americans actually have plenty of time to research what's in their food, using common sense and turning off American Idol would be a good start.
Most consumers who buy a coffee pot don't research whether it has a history of catching fire, or if the stories about that brand of coffee pot catching fire are true or just a rumor. That's why companies pay to submit their electrical products to UL for testing. If the product doesn't meet UL's safety standards the product won't get UL's certification stamp, or if the product proves itself to be unsafe in the market, UL will revoke it's certified stamp of approval. If the retailer/consumer repects UL's reputation they will buy it without further research.
The same would apply to food products in the absence of the FDA. A company like Del Monte for example, is rumored to be a GMO food product, the company could pay to have the product tested and approved by a group similar to UL, say "Organic Food Growers" or "United Food Safety Laboratories". If consumers trust the reputation of that group they would need look no further than the "OFG" and/or "UFSL" seals of approval stamped on the product.