The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: Umm.....

(See in situ)


Here is the quote from your source:
"The official election code refers to the fact that a voter who wishes to cast a vote for a write-in Presidential candidate must write-in the names of his/her 21 Presidential Electors on the ballot. However, according to a PA Bureau of Elections official, historically counties in PA have counted whatever is written in. If voters write in the actual candidate’s name, that write-in vote has been counted for the candidate.
The official said that the distinction between “presidential elector” and “presidential candidate” is allowed to be blurred. However, he said that he always advises write-in candidates to contact the various counties in PA to assure that all the votes written in for them are counted as such – for example, without that communication, some counties might not watch out for various spellings of a candidates name, and end up counting them as separate votes, etc. The official admitted that Pennsylvania’s system is archaic and not good.
He said that there should be some kind of pre-certification of write-in candidates like those that operate in other states, so that the county and state elections boards are all on the same page as to who the write-in candidates are, who to count votes for, etc. He said that if PA were to actually hold to the code which states that the 21 electors must be written in, and not the candidates name, it would be challenged, and the challenger would easily win the case."

Yup....really cut and dried. Who's crazy?

First of all, unless the Ron Paul campaign has done any kind of precertification, your point is not supported here. Secondly, let's ignore the whole "vote for 21 electors" nonsense, the practice is based on counties, and therefore more useable for local and state elections.

No - you have proven nothing. Very few, if any, Ron Paul votes will be counted. And no, I am not Johnsonista. I may vote for him, I may not. I am only interested in truth, and not misleading friends. I don't think anyone has any illusion that Johnson will win the presidency. Many of your fellow liberty-lovers do want their votes to count, however.

"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."--Mark Twain