Show us where "he has consistently voted to allow your 1st, 4th, 5th and 6th amendment rights to be violated." Nothing in that article deals in of what you claim. MORSE v. FREDERICK (No. 06-278) 439 F. 3d 1114 relates to students promoting illegal drugs in school claiming free speech.
"The Court today decides that a public school may prohibit speech advocating illegal drug use. I agree and therefore join its opinion in full. I write separately to state my view that the standard set forth in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist., 393 U. S. 503 (1969) , is without basis in the Constitution."
Remind you this is PUBLIC schools. Read the opinion before you make up your nonsense.
I'm not gonna read a book. You made the statements. So back it up with quotes and citations. Didn't they teach you this in law school? Then again, most lawyers I run into, have no clue how to present a coherent case
The only thing that article proves, which we already knew, is that Thomas doesn't engage much on the bench with litigants.
If you disagree with me on anything you are not a real libertarian...