Comment: When they were

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: No one. Just answering questions. (see in situ)

When they were

being passed, Mitt supported the TARP bailouts, the auto bailouts, he did in fact say Romneycare would be a good model for the nation (if you'd like I will get you the youtube link,) then when he ran for POTUS he changed his wording to "other states," he is for the PATRIOT ACT and wants to strengthen it, he is for the 2012NDAA.

Okay, he might have conveniently changed his mind about the TARP bailouts / Auto bailouts, and Romneycare being a model for the nation now that he is running for office, but he still currently supports a stronger patriot act and the 2012NDAA act, and the FRB's actions. How can you honestly say those policies are more federalist than Bush or BO? Those are some of the most pressing issues of to this day.

I just do not see your logic or reasoning. And I dunno, the MSM says Mitt is quite a hunk, so if policy wasn't of issue, cuteness would be up for debate as well.

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” – Dresden James