Comment: No, my message was addressed

(See in situ)

No, my message was addressed

No, my message was addressed to you, and most here don't use threats, insults, and force in virtually every line of our messages. I didn't post the original post. I didn't post the 30+ thoughtful posts from different users pro and con.

Your message, hardly all examples either:
religious zealots (insult)
that try to force organized (aka centralized) (advocating force)
down the throats (force)
fictitious all powerful, vengeful deity (insult)
in your fantasy land (insult)
If you have a problem with (my) notion
you're in the wrong movement (threat)

Note to claim falsely that someone is a thief or murderer is to claim the right to use force, so it's more than a lie. False accusations or slanders in this context is you advocating force.

You need to follow your own advice, and not be a free speech facist. If you don't like a discussion, you don't have to drown out free discussion.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.