Why would anyone be "ethically bound to vote for Republican candidates as an agreed upon condition of your position within the California Republican Party"?
It's not like RP seems to feel "ethically bound" to vote for Romney.
If you're ethically bound to vote for anyone as a condition of GOP membership, wouldn't it be the candidate that is most likely to do the GOP that Ron wants to see, some good? Which would be whichever candidate most effectively teaches GOP strategists that it is in their interest to nominate candidates more like Ron than Mitt.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its o