The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: GJ said on Twitter he would appoint pro-life Judge Nap to SCOTUS
GJ said on Twitter he would appoint pro-life Judge Nap to SCOTUS
Gary Johnson has a nuanced and confusing position on abortion. On the one hand, he believes that Roe v. Wade (1973) "expanded the reach of the Federal government" and vows to overturn the decision by appointing judges "who will interpret the Constitution according to its original meaning." On the other, he has argued that a woman has a right to have an abortion "until the viability of the fetus," which is the position that Roe v. Wade takes. What this suggests is that Johnson is casually pro-choice but opposes pro-choice federal policies, and should be regarded as an anti-abortion candidate for policy analysis purposes.
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
My website: http://www.libertypoet.com/
STAND WITH RAND 2016
Replies to this comment: