















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
©


Comment: I agree on Morgan
I agree on Morgan
I agree completely with you on Morgan. With King, the only thing I feel he had going was whoever did his booking got the most sought after guests. Might be because they knew it was so safe. Still, this guy became a characature of himself. He was parodied so many times and in most cases the parody was not much unlike the real thing. I think this is what worries me in the sense that it may lead to the whole debate not being taken as seriously. He's one of those peeps who is famous mainly for being famous, not because of any real substance to his work. Your point is a good one though. If he is true to form and lets these candidates speak, he might end up being the perfect host. I sincerely hope that is the case.