Comment: Test anyone

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Fast Thoughts (see in situ)

Test anyone

Please

Examples 1,2, and 3.

Example 1:

The Declaration of Independence declares the moral duty of rebellion against criminal government.

The Constitution authorizes the squashing of rebellion as if the rebels are cockroaches.

Example 2:

Capitalism, at the root of it, is a method by which each individual will secure their own requirements to the exclusion of all others.

Socialism, at the root of it, is the sovereignty of the individual supreme among man made laws.

Example 3:

You do not have to have a license to work any job in America according to the supreme law of the land.

Now, Bear, you offered the Interview with Griffin and the Ex-Bolshevik Russian Legal Criminal Mercenary - defected, and he says:

"The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already, for the last 35 years, actually over-fulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where previously not even comrade Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such a tremendous success; most of it is done by Americans to Americans, thanks to lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before:
Exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information with the authentic truth, with documents, with pictures, even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it until he is going to receive a kick in his bottom, when a military boot crashes, then he will understand, not before."

I have shown you, using the official documents printed and published from the official sources where:

The Declaration of Independence declares the moral duty of rebellion against criminal government.

AND

The Constitution authorizes the squashing of rebellion as if the rebels are cockroaches.

You can see that, perhaps, I do, and you are among how many people willing, and able, to see it? Do you know that those facts point to a Money Monopoly Power that is not unique to The Soviet Union?

I've can show the documentations, how the World Reserve Currency Power, at the time when it was stationed in England, was allowing, making, The Revolutionary War real, but it did not matter who lost, or who won, since the Monopolists had agents like Alexander Hamilton able to subvert the Common Law (moral law) and turn it into Legal Crime, and then move the Money Monopoly Power to America, from England.

Who, look around, anywhere you look, can see the truth there?

The Constitution was the usurpation. Legal Crime won. Legal Crime is the Money Monopoly Power at the root.

I can link Patrick Henry spelling everything out about The Constitution, and who, look around, has their eyes open, and the bananas taken out of their ears?

You may have past that test, and you may see the truth too.

Next:

I've shown you how Capitalism, according to the Capitalists, Carl Menger specifically, proves that Capitalism is a pricing scheme, used by people who "secure their own requirements to the exclusion of all others" where Scarcity determines Value, where there can be no value if things are not scarce, and, and, and, I've shown you where socialism started as a mutual agreement to recognize the sovereignty of the individual as the supreme man made, equitable, law, as reported by Stephen Pearl Andrews, and I've shown you how The Communist Manifesto openly rejects socialism and makes a specific reference to the links, through Fourier, to those who became known as the Individualist Anarchists, whereby the following is understandable as being true:

Capitalism, at the root of it, is a method by which each individual will secure their own requirements to the exclusion of all others.

Socialism, at the root of it, is the sovereignty of the individual supreme among man made laws.

Who is even remotely capable of seeing the truth when presented with that test?

No one.

Look far and wide, in America, and know that Yuri Bezmenov is telling at least half the truth. The half he is not telling is that it isn't Soviet Russia that is the root of the POWER causing these things. The root of the power causing these things is the root found at the end of the World Reserve Currency POWER trail, as anyone can follow the money to that source anytime they please. Some people do, and they speak to The Sound of Silence.

Call Common Law, or Moral Law, by any name, anytime, and how long after the moral people begin to access it, before the name will change as if by magic?

How long before Red becomes Blue, seemingly over night, by some mysterious force of magic?

You won't dare admit that socialism was once a synonym for common law, never mind your power to admit that socialism was a synonym for God's Law, so far from that truth are you, in my opinion, that you might as well be on a different planet from the truth of it.

I have been wrong often, and there is no skin off my nose now if you can show me exactly where I am wrong in this case.

Again the proof:

http://www.anarchism.net/scienceofsociety.htm

"What, then, if this be so, is this common element? In what great feature are Protestantism, Democracy, and Socialism identical? I will answer this interrogatory first, and demonstrate the answer afterward. Protestantism, Democracy, and Socialism are identical in the assertion of the Supremacy of the Individual,--a dogma essentially contumacious, revolutionary, and antagonistic to the basic principles of all the older institutions of society, which make the Individual subordinate and subject to the Church, to the State, and to Society respectively. Not only is this supremacy or SOVEREIGNTY OF THE INDIVIDUAL, a common element of all three of these great modern movements, but I will make the still more sweeping assertion that it is substantially the whole of those movements. It is not merely a feature, as I have just denominated it, but the living soul itself, the vital energy, the integral essence or being of them all."

I've shown you the information connecting the dots, but you can't see it, it is outside your power to do so, and that is OK, there is so much that is outside my power to see too. We are in the same boat that is described by Yuri Bezmenov.

On to test 3, which is something new to me, something I tried on my wife, and something just today I tried on my own mother as a test:

Example 3:

You do not have to have a license to work any job in America according to the supreme law of the land.

My wife and mother, and myself for that matter, have Real Estate licenses. I know the facts, and so do they, but when I ask either one of them if it is lawful for someone to sell or buy Real Estate in California without a license they jerk their knees and say no.

No, they say, you have to have a license.

Licensed lawyers will say, no, you have to have a license to practice law in California.

Licensed doctors will say, no, you have to have a license to practice medicine in California.

How deep does the falsehood go down into our souls?

And as far as the name "socialism" for those whose brains turn off at the sound of it, please know the truth offered by Shakespeare, and please know that I don't define words according to dictates offered by you or anyone else, I define words according to specific definitions according to the original meanings intended during the inventing process of those words, when the occasion demands that method of defining words. Current meanings of words do tend to be opposite of past meanings of words for some mysterious and strange reason.

Liberal was once a word used to describe a person who was a Friend of Liberty, such as a Thomas Paine, or a Patrick Henry, or Samuel Adams.

Now, as you may be pleased to do, you can throw stones at Liberals and feel good about it - perhaps.

Shakespeare:

JULIET:
'Tis but thy name that is my enemy;
Thou art thyself, though not a Montague.
What's Montague? it is nor hand, nor foot,
Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part
Belonging to a man. O, be some other name!
What's in a name? that which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;
So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call'd,
Retain that dear perfection which he owes
Without that title. Romeo, doff thy name,
And for that name which is no part of thee
Take all myself.

Now, Bear, note how my neck is stuck out, and the Mob can now stone the socialist, if someone were to connect the false dots, and yet all I do is offer the information discovered during my pathetic example of a Trial by One Juror.

I can get back to the video to see what else is said by the Ex-Bolshevik communist working for who, and intending to cause what to happen to who?

Joe