Comment: Let me rephrase my question, a - - hole.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: eight direct implications (see in situ)

Let me rephrase my question, a - - hole.

I'm not talking about baseless allegations, I'm talking about allegations based in fact, even one quote of somebody that says, "Rand ordered this."

You have none. You have only conjecture.

What these reporters (whom I do like generally) do is say they were harassed by some office, but NOT Rand or somebody directly from Rand's office.

I'm open to hearing proof, but there is no proof, only allegations, and I must ask why is there such sloppy journalism here?? It diminishes WAC's credibility.

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a rEVOLution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford