how they figure the math and longevity in the evolution morphology of a single-celled organisms into a complex multi-celled, multi-organic specie of ONE sex and then be able to procreate without the other sex of the same specie within the evolution time-frame of millions of years? (e.g. homosapien)
It simply is not probable that both sex of the same specie were present at the same time. The mutations which would be required for either sex is astronomical in and of itself.
To ask simply, who came first, the man or the woman? And then ask how may years apart were each present?
Let's say for argument sake that two amoebas evolved concurrently into homosapiens; each forming identical organs, the lungs, so that it could breathe, then a million years later it develops the trachea so that it can connect with the mouth to breath more efficiently. But where did the mouth come from? And could you have the mouth without the head? Could you have the nose, ears, brain, neurons, blood cells, the skull, skin and hair all at once?
Maybe the other amoeba develops its stomach first, but i'm just guessing. But you see the picture. This complex metamorphosis takes place not once but twice for most known creatures on this planet, minus bacterial, viral and other lowly creatures. Or at least once if you truly believe all life comes from a single-celled organism.
And were they looking for each other? Did they even question that there was another? If they were lucky to have existed at the same time, how long did it take for them to find each other? Was it love at first sight?
People make outlandish scientific hypotheses all the time, with plenty of holes but somehow continue to adopt them as if they were proven facts.
I'm not here trying to make argument for the Creationist per se. Although I would agree more toward the existence of higher being/beings rather than subject myself to unbelievable "accidents" to justify evolution, because it seems to be the only language the scientist were given.
—
counter-intelligence & psychological operations programs keep the herd stupid & the uninitiated running in circles. They are far-reaching; usually within the confines of denial.
Comment: I'd like to pose a simple question to an evolutionist on
I'd like to pose a simple question to an evolutionist on
how they figure the math and longevity in the evolution morphology of a single-celled organisms into a complex multi-celled, multi-organic specie of ONE sex and then be able to procreate without the other sex of the same specie within the evolution time-frame of millions of years? (e.g. homosapien)
It simply is not probable that both sex of the same specie were present at the same time. The mutations which would be required for either sex is astronomical in and of itself.
To ask simply, who came first, the man or the woman? And then ask how may years apart were each present?
Let's say for argument sake that two amoebas evolved concurrently into homosapiens; each forming identical organs, the lungs, so that it could breathe, then a million years later it develops the trachea so that it can connect with the mouth to breath more efficiently. But where did the mouth come from? And could you have the mouth without the head? Could you have the nose, ears, brain, neurons, blood cells, the skull, skin and hair all at once?
Maybe the other amoeba develops its stomach first, but i'm just guessing. But you see the picture. This complex metamorphosis takes place not once but twice for most known creatures on this planet, minus bacterial, viral and other lowly creatures. Or at least once if you truly believe all life comes from a single-celled organism.
And were they looking for each other? Did they even question that there was another? If they were lucky to have existed at the same time, how long did it take for them to find each other? Was it love at first sight?
People make outlandish scientific hypotheses all the time, with plenty of holes but somehow continue to adopt them as if they were proven facts.
I'm not here trying to make argument for the Creationist per se. Although I would agree more toward the existence of higher being/beings rather than subject myself to unbelievable "accidents" to justify evolution, because it seems to be the only language the scientist were given.
counter-intelligence & psychological operations programs keep the herd stupid & the uninitiated running in circles. They are far-reaching; usually within the confines of denial.
Replies to this comment: