Comment: We already did.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I have a single question: (see in situ)

We already did.

"Now how is it that we have an equitable discussion while reviewing the Speer's book?"

I asked you to read the book, and I reported specific reasons as to why I asked you to read the book.

You hesitated and, rejected, then read, and meanwhile I thanked you for the help, in the discussion that didn't happen, because I was set straight as I had hoped your help could provide.

I was stuck on the words Federal and National as being opposite my own USE of those words in that book that we are not discussing.

The obvious conclusion is the same one I arrive at each time:

Why not call it crime when that is what it is, and who benefits when YOU call it socialism, indirectly, or directly, from out of the dark, or right up in my face?