The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: Give my regards to your wise mother.

(See in situ)

Give my regards to your wise mother.

Those planning to go to the moon will most likely die before getting there. If they stay healthy enough to die of old age, I hope they consider it a blessing. None should attempt the voyage w/o a firm understanding of Van Allen Belts. They should study Stanley Kubrick's cinema photography to see with their own eyes photographic tricks that mooned the world.

Three views of the Moon Landing films:

  1. Live!... The pop view. The completely fake films mooned the world & still do.
  2. How Stanley Kubrick faked the Apollo Moon Landings:
    Alchemical Kubrick II
    By Jay Weidner ... Copyright 2009.

    Fake photography, but man did go unseen. Using clandestine top-secret advanced technology...

  3. Shock ! Stanley Kubrick Filmed Fake Moon Footage !! - Proof ! This is one of thousands of documentaries. Separating lies from damn lies is difficult.

    The entire Apollo Moon landing was stage film production off Broadway... Way off Broadway! ... Fake!

1. Live! "Is it live? Or is it Memorex?"

2. No one knows how the powers that be (PTB) convinced Kubrick to direct the Apollo landings. Maybe they had compromised Kubrick in some way. The fact that his brother, Raul Kubrick, was the head of the American Communist Party may have been one of the avenues pursued by the government to get Stanley to cooperate. ...

It looks like Stanley Kubrick faked the moon landings in return for two things. The first was a virtually unlimited budget to make his ultimate science fiction film: 2001: A Space Odyssey, and the second was that he would be able to make any film he wanted, with no oversight from anyone, for the rest of his life.

... The production of 2001: A Space Odyssey parallels the Apollo program. The production started in 1964 and went on to the release of 2001: A Space Odyssey in1968. Meanwhile the Apollo program went from 1964 and culminated with the first moon landings on July 20th 1969. ... The most pressing problem for Kubrick in 1964 was to figure out a way to make the shots on the ground, on the surface of the moon, look real. He had to make the scenes look expansive like it was really done on the moon and not in a studio back lot. ... Eventually Kubrick settled on doing the entire thing with a cinematic technique called Front Screen Projection. It is in the use of this cinematic technique that the fingerprints of Kubrick can be seen all over the Apollo material.

Also it is very interesting to note that Frederick Ordway worked both for NASA and the Apollo program and was Kubrick's top science advisor on 2001: A Space Odyssey.

3. Kubrick cinema was good enough to fool most of the people most of the time. Kubrick was paid handsomely for his film mooning the world with NASA's pilots & scripted film version of Moon missions.

The Russians were pad off with $5 billion affectionately called "agricultural support" as there grain production failed coincidentally during the NASA Apollo program. Imagine the whole continental Russian crop failures, yet none showed up on NASA film voyages. Perhaps even the Russian crop failures were faked too. Scientists knew, even at near the speed of light, radio transmission would take about 2 seconds to send/receive. There was no such delay when NASA nor the President spoke to the Astronauts where ever they were. The Lunar Lander was not made to land on nor take off from the moon. The Lunar Lander was a set prop. As for stars filmed outside Earth orbit? Kubrick edited them out when filming, as they would would not match celestial reality.

Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul