Comment: More Forum Delays while editing

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: No help (see in situ)

More Forum Delays while editing

"So it appears that the Bill of Rights were not sufficient to protect the electorate seeing the resolutions followed almost 10 years afterward?"

Here is a link to:
Source: Claypoole's Daily Advertiser, August 11, 1794

Whiskey Rebellion Proclamation
By the president of the United States of America
A Proclamation

You wrote:

"Let me see…the bill of Rights became effective December 15, 1791"

So...The Bill of Rights in 1791 and then a Conscripted National Army (the size of the all volunteer one used to defeat the British) was assembled by the Dictator in Chief to invade Pennsylvania where the tax slaves were revolting, and crush the Spirit of 1776 out of their sorry behinds, done in 1794.

Quoting from the end of the Proclamation:


And whereas, it is in my judgment necessary under the circumstances of the case to take measures for calling forth the militia in order to suppress the combinations aforesaid, and to cause the laws to be duly executed; and I have accordingly determined so to do, feeling the deepest regret for the occasion, but withal the most solemn conviction that the essential interests of the Union demand it, that the very existence of government and the fundamental principles of social order are materially involved in the issue, and that the patriotism and firmness of all good citizens are seriously called upon, as occasions may require, to aid in the effectual suppression of so fatal a spirit;

Therefore, and in pursuance of the proviso above recited, I. George Washington, President of the United States, do hereby command all persons, being insurgents, as aforesaid, and all others whom it may concern, on or before the 1st day of September next to disperse and retire peaceably to their respective abodes. And I do moreover warn all persons whomsoever against aiding, abetting, or comforting the perpetrators of the aforesaid treasonable acts; and do require all officers and other citizens, according to their respective duties and the laws of the land, to exert their utmost endeavors to prevent and suppress such dangerous proceedings.

In testimony whereof I have caused the seal of the United States of America to be affixed to these presents, and signed the same with my hand. Done at the city of Philadelphia the seventh day of August, one thousand seven hundred and ninety- four, and of the independence of the United States of America the nineteenth.

By the President, Edm. Randolph

During Shays's Rebellion the Central Bankers demanding a Tax on a money competitor (Whiskey grown at home on the farms), demanded to be paid in Gold, the tax was demanded to be paid in Gold, was too much of the same old Dictatorship for the Revolutionary War veterans, who were making a living without Gold as money, since the Gold was no longer available, because the Central Banker Fraud money the frauds used to finance Aggressive Wars for Profit into Canada, was no longer accepted by importers who imported goods into Massachusetts, or any of the other States resorting to deceptive money, which means that the Gold leaves the Continent by way of something called Gresham's Law, where Importers of goods only accept Gold, not Funny Money, not Monopoly Money, in exchange for their imported goods, so no one, except the No bid Contractors, the legal Criminals, and the then working Military Industrial Complex, and the Foreigners importing goods, has any Gold, not the farmers, only the foreigners have Gold, not the farmers who pay taxes, only those who don't pay taxes have Gold, not the farmers, only the foreigners, no Gold left for the farmers, so they make and use Whiskey instead of Gold, being inventive people, so the Revolutionary War Veterans, doing fine on their Farms, with their own money, that they can make at home, this Whiskey stuff, are not happy to have fought a war, betting their farms on winning, winning the war, going home, and finding that the new bosses are the same as the old bosses, when the new bosses step over the line and demand Gold as payment of taxes on whiskey, but since it is Shays's Rebellion, and not the later Whiskey Rebellion, and since it is under The Articles of Confederation and not under The Constitution (with or without the Bill of Rights), the Tax Evader Slaves Rebellion, although crushed in Massachusetts, isn't so bad for the Runaway Slaves, like Daniel Shays, as they can run into Vermont, which is still part of the voluntary Union under the Articles of Confederation, and the Federal Level Employees, hired to preserve Liberty, Legal Criminals or not, do not do anything to return the runaway Slaves from Vermont back to Massachusetts.

The precedent is set. Not in stone.

Why skip over that interesting part of the story?

Why skip over that and go 6 years later, going past the Alien and Sedition Acts, and then going into the time period where the useful Idiot Madison grows something remotely resembling a conscience?

Am I being overly repetitive when I keep going back to the precedent set by Shays's Rebellion?

Under the Articles of Confederation the Country of freedom fighters managed to repel the largest Invading Aggressive Army for Fun and Profit on the Planet Earth, and it was done with an all volunteer Army, despite a dictatorial General named Washington, and with the help of the French who were also working to fight against the same Invading Aggressive Army for Fun and Profit, which was also the headquarters for the World Reserve Currency Power at that time - The Bank of England or whatever False Front was used on the stationary.

The Volunteer Military Power Defended Liberty in American under The Articles of Confederation.

The Volunteer Military Power Defended Liberty in American under The Articles of Confederation.

The Volunteer Military Power Defended Liberty in American under The Articles of Confederation.

The Volunteer Military Power Defended Liberty in American under The Articles of Confederation.

I think that bears repeating.

Why skip over that point?

The Conscripted Military Power of Aggressive War for Fun and Profit, defending the Central Bank Monopoly, invaded the formerly sovereign State of Pennsylvania in 1794, headed by the same Dictatorial General who mismanaged the previous Revolutionary War, Washington, now Monarch of the New Legal Crime Regime of Frauds and Extortionists, so as to CRUSH THE SPIRIT OF 1776 for at least another 200 years.

Why skip over that point?

Why jump past those events and leap into The Alien and Sedition Acts, or leap over, skipping over, Crushing the Spirit of Liberty, in 1794, and move into the time period where Madison turns his coat?

I don't get it.

"We" (the mouse in my pocket) have skipped over the crushing of liberty out of America, in 1794, so as to focus attention on other things, because we both agree that the 1794 crushing of the Spirit of Liberty, which was also the crushing of monetary competition, which was also a display of another Aggressive War for Fun and Profit by a National Level Dictatorial Power without restraint, and having agreed that the 1794 crushing of Liberty was of the utmost significance, we move onto other things?

"So it appears that the Bill of Rights were not sufficient to protect the electorate seeing the resolutions followed almost 10 years afterward?"

The Invasion of the former Sovereign State of Pennsylvania by the Conscripted Army of Aggressors for Fun and Profit, which was reported to be an Army the size of the Army used to Defend Liberty during the Revolutionary War, was reported to be a bit of an excess, since a few actual PEOPLE were injured, or killed, in that abuse of POWER by a Legal Criminal Cabal that included one named Alexander Hamilton was overkill.

Not a very economical employment of Criminal Power, but, then again, who pays the bills?

Alexander Hamilton was working on the Central Bank PLANK of the not yet written Communist Method.

10 Bill of Rights

10 Planks to the Communist Method

Central Bank Plank of The Communist Method not yet written, exactly, in 1794, which was 4 years after The Bill of Rights is supposedly "law"?

No where in the Bill of Rights does it say the we the people agree to buy only one money from one source from now on until we die, and our children die, in that type of fraud and extortion made legal.

No where in the Bill of Rights does it say the we the people agree to trade our good faith and credit for debt instead.

If I believe in lies, then I am powerless against those who invent those lies, because they know better and I don't.

“With national plans and programs, the national officials [Legal Criminals] simply roll the dice for all 284 million people in the United States and hope they get things right."

Would that be called Criminal Socialism?

Please consider holding up your part of any future agreements we make between each other as I am now at a loss to understand where we are concerning the use of the word Socialism.

Are we avoiding the S word, or are we demonizing it?

Take your pick, and I can agree to avoid using it, and if you continue to demonize it, I will continue to point out the fact that there are 2 version of it, one is genuine, and the other is counterfeit.

If you continue to demonize IT, and you are demonizing the counterfeit version, then my response will be the same response of asking you to consider calling it CRIME since it is CRIME, not socialism, and therefore who benefits when YOU cover up CRIME with a False Front?

"Would that be called Criminal Socialism? A Criminal Scientific of Society at a Whole without the consent of those being governed? But you know…they tried their little socialized medicine experiment in Massachusetts? And now the PRESUMPTIVE nominee of that Party called Republican is indeed the Republican Candidate and the discussion is no longer will we have national health care, but rather what kind of national health care shall we have."

How about another Test that you will refuse to take?

A plague begins to kill everyone in Europe.

The plague lands in New Jersey, and everyone in New Jersey is now dead, and the plague is spreading to your town.

Meanwhile someone invents a cure.

Capitalist methodology:

The inventor of the cure prices the cure at that which the market will bear, and he or she makes a killing, becomes very rich.

Socialist methodology:

Science is applied to the problem and the obvious scientific conclusion is that the cure, if priced below cost, will result in less dead people.

How did you do on the test?

Are we done with Socialism for good?

I have no problem with avoiding the word socialism at all costs, if that is our mutual agreement.

If you want to demonize socialism, and you are actually wanting to demonize CRIME, then why call it something other than CRIME - cui bono?