Comment: I find it convenient

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Who rejects micro-evolution? (see in situ)

I find it convenient

that the only thing you argued in that whole comment was the subjective disagreement on where the line is drawn between micro and macro. I may have been a little over-reaching in my categorization of micro but you are definitely incorrect about there not being any creationists denying micro. I have found many that claim dog breeding is not any level of evolution and that god did that for us.

Where is your retort on the other questions? e.g. do you believe in nuclear decay being a testable, repeatable and time-able process?