Comment: This could very well be

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Same Old Story - Different Fossil (see in situ)

This could very well be

This could very well be true... Maybe one day a more complete fossil, or even a living specimen will be discovered that will falsify the evidence. Although if you view the evidence for tiktaalik being a transitional fossil, it is quite compelling. The important lesson here is that nothing in science is absolute. We will admit when we are wrong and go back to the drawing board. It can therefore be said that anything that still stands in science, does so because it has withstood scrutiny, and has never been disproven. I could point out a dozen examples of things that creationists have had to retract from... Creationists once held that the earth was at the center of the universe. Creationists used to interpret geological events, earthquakes, valcano's, etc... as God exercising his wrath. Before the germ theory, it was thought that infection was a punishment from God. The list goes on and on. It actually affirms the integrity of a discipline when they are willing to accept their faults. The same goes both ways.

an idea whose time has come cannot be stopped by any army or any government