Comment: The site is a joke, and so is

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Thanks for the link (see in situ)

The site is a joke, and so is

The site is a joke, and so is the blog post you refer to; the very first paragraph demonstrates it.

Paul wrote c. 55 AD, to the Corinthians regarding the core facts of the gospel formally handed to him through the official testimony communicated by Peter, James, John and other leading witnesses in Jerusalem, c. 35 - 38 AD.

So this is written 55 years after the events, but wait why did it take him 20 YEARS to write it down? And of course as usual, the story was passed by hearsay.

This proves nothing of the supposed godlyness and miracles that you claim of your god. Secondary sources and decades after the fact does not lead to much historical accuracy. If your god was so great, why didn't they write about him while he was alive and immediatly after his death? What took them so many years?

"Lighthouses are more useful than churches."- Ben Franklin
"Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise."- James Madison