The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by s


Comment: From an economical
From an economical
From an economical standpoint, this is a bad idea.
It has been shown that VAT or sales taxes are really bad in one way: they are most easily passed on to the customer. Since the customer is "punished" more for consuming, he will consume less. Since he consumes less, the producers will lay off workers because they desire to produce less supply. It is a bad cycle that ends up with the economy in worse-off shape.
On the other hands, taxation of profits and income have less of a deletrious effect. Taxation of income happens wether money is spent or not, so consumption is only primarly affected by the level of taxation. Taxation of profits is shared by the customer, the producer, the worker, and the investor. For economical examples, we've seen that the Bush tax cuts passed almost nothing along to the customer (investors took everything), while profit taxes in Europe have been almost completely absored by investors.
It is perhaps less principled, but it is more pragmatic.
Plan for eliminating the national debt in 10-20 years:
Overview: http://rolexian.wordpress.com/2010/09/12/my-plan-for-reducin...
Specific cuts; defense spending: http://rolexian.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/more-detailed-look-a
Replies to this comment: