Comment: You are arguing

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: The "Tea Party" wasn't a (see in situ)

You are arguing

By diverting the issue. It wasn't a political party, that's true. But it was a movement started by RON PAUL. What's more important since it wasn't even an institute, it should be in theory, harder to infiltrate. in cases which political parties ANY individual can call themselves one from that party.

What can you see here? Anyone can claim to be Libertarian, like anyone can claim themselves to be a TEA Party candidate,They both equally can be infiltrated.

"Truth is Treason in an Empire that lies" - Ron Paul

Educate the masses, and win in the end.