Comment: "AS LONG AS THEY DO NO HARM

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Wrong! (see in situ)

"AS LONG AS THEY DO NO HARM

"AS LONG AS THEY DO NO HARM TO OTHERS!"
This isn't doing harm to others. If you believe GMOs are unhealthy, then these people who consume them are being ignorant and therefore it's their fault. It's just the same as if tobacco was unlabeled (although I understand there are some strange people on here that think tobacco is good for you), there would be people who would consume it ignorantly regardless. Do you support the labeling of tobacco?

"Individuals have the right to know if what they are eating can harm them so that they can make a CHOICE whether to consume it or not."
No, they do not. They can make a choice when they choose to purchase the product. Products that are not GM could advertise as GM-free and get more sales, providing a free market solution to this problem.

"You are very confused by the true meaning of the Constitution."
Where exactly does the Constitution of the United States address this?

"They are not voting to ban GMO's in California but rather to require them to LABEL if their products contain GMO's so that individuals can make an intelligent choice. What part of this issue don't you understand??"
I understand all of this issue. If I were to grow GMOs in my backyard and then try to sell them on without labeling them as GMOs (without explicitly lying and saying they were GM-free), I could be arrested. This hurts any small business considering selling GMOs just as badly as it hurts big business. Additionally, it's a waste of taxpayer dollars in a bankrupt state.

"You are standing for Corporatism rather than the INDIVIDUALISM!!"
Just like Ron Paul, who agrees with me on this issue, I stand for capitalism.

Support Rand, Amash & other liberty candidates? Check out: http://www.LibertyConservatives.com/