Comment: It COULD be because he is an ACTUAL CANDIDATE, who is

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: They are supporting him because of (see in situ)

It COULD be because he is an ACTUAL CANDIDATE, who is

actually running for office.

Not a NONcandidate - who is only being considered for a silly write-in-campaign that he never said he wanted.

Lets see - on one side we have a REAL CANDIDATE from a REAL party.

On the other we have a pretend write-in-campaign that could never work in a national election, a man who never asked for this, and a bunch of people who can't accept reality.

Real or pretend fantasy - which one should I choose?