Comment: Not enough proof

(See in situ)

In post: Gary Johnson
In reply to comment: Allow me to clarify... I (see in situ)

Not enough proof

You say, "I indicated that the baby was you, because it was dependent upon your eating to feed itself."

But that's not true ten minutes before it's born. Seems like a pretty imperfect doctrine.

Next was, "Also, it grew inside your body so indeed it is your body."

So if you become infected by a virus, parasite or bacteria, that is YOU? Even though it could be actively killing you, and is capable of living without any assistance from you?
What about a tapeworm that was birthed inside your body? Is that your body? Your argument doesn't work.

I don't think you've really proved that a fetus is the body of its mother.