Comment: The point is Johnson sued

(See in situ)

The point is Johnson sued

The point is Johnson sued under the anti-trust law for being excluded from free and open access to the debates. Isn't hypocritical participating in the alternative debate that is excluding two of the original four candidates based on their less-favorable polling numbers -- the very same criteria under which he was excluded from the "prime time" debates! So his claimed belief in open access was a lie as well --all he cared about was being in the privileged position and as soon as he got it he didn't give a damn about so-called "open access to debate"