Comment: Completely agree; great explanation

(See in situ)


Completely agree; great explanation

I've attempted to make some of the same points in several threads, but you are more eloquent than I -- or maybe more patient.

Of course we are guessing when we say that Rand had coaching, or at least an implicit okay, from his father before he made the endorsement. But our guessing makes a lot more sense than the GUESSING of those who assert (as if they are God) that Rand betrayed his own father (and us). And it is certainly a lot more Christian.

And the way things shaped up Rand's endorsement of Romney seems almost brilliant. A perfect setup for 2016. But, of course, I'm sure that's all ...just coincidence.

"There are no coincidences in politics." -Franklin Delano Roosevelt

Bill of Rights /Amendment X: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Do you need a politician or judge to "interpret" those 28