"We have to stop with the drone strikes."
THAT is a lot stronger and more recent than the thing about leaving options on the table. Leaving options on the table is a negotiating tactic - it doesn't say "I will do EVERYTHING. I will use every option". (Like drone strikes.) It says "I am not telling you what my strategy will be."
Yet all the anti-Gary Johnson people pretended that mean he would continue drone strikes. When he never said such a thing.
He SAID "We have to stop with the drone strikes." THATS pretty specific. Yet you ignored it in favor of the misleading statement.
Why? Why didn't you want people to know the truth?
There can be only one reason - you were BIASED against Gary Johnson.
Therefore your whole "analysis" is tainted.