Comment: Minor v. Happersett

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: You are correct about this (see in situ)

Minor v. Happersett

No one is attempting to change the meaning of the constitution, so what's your point? The SC can and does rule on how the constitution applies to a set of facts or circumstances before the court. And they do from time to time attempt to ascertain the intent of the founders when they used the specific words that make up the constitution.
Thanks for the links, I'll check it out.

“...taxes are not raised to carry on wars, but that wars are raised to carry on taxes”
Thomas Paine, Rights of Man