Comment: Very good questions?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Who wins? (see in situ)

Very good questions?

"We are in a break from the monopoly at the moment. I have a question...is it equitable to skip rent if the owner does not notice occupancy?"

Before answering that specific question I think it may be justified to work, willfully, toward connecting the answer to this Topic in some way - if possible.

Why are people inspired to lie at debates?

Why are people inspired to pay a price for renting?

In both cases there is a measurable answer, and if the measuring is done accurately, then the very good questions will be justly answered.

People are inspired to lie at debates because there is a scarcity, or demand, for those lies, and therefore PEOPLE produce that which is demanded, so as to supply that which is demanded, so as to meet the demand for that which is demanded.

People are inspired to pay the price for renting because there is a scarcity too, something is demanded, and then PEOPLE produce that which is demanded, so as to supply that which is demanded, so as to meet the demand for that which is demanded.

That is the general POWER perspective I work from, my rock of Liberty, and it works for me, as you have seen, or may want to see, better, and from that the general perspective can be made much more specific to any case.

The case of the Debate, for example, involves a young man supplying he demand for lies, with lies, if the case turns out to be a case of "Pro", or justifying, fraud, extortion, torture, and mass murder made legal.

That is very specific, and if the measure is accurate, then can the measure be made more accurate, which means: can the perspective of that specific case be made LESS false?

The case of the RENT payments, if made specific, has to be a person, in time and place, inspired to pay RENT, to a person, in time and place, for something in time and place.

RENT = Purchasing POWER

A person produces (or steals, or acquires, or gains control of) purchasing POWER in the form of Federal Reserve Notes, in a typical case of a person paying RENT, to another person.

Why?

The good question again (to remind anyone as to the POINT):

"We are in a break from the monopoly at the moment. I have a question...is it equitable to skip rent if the owner does not notice occupancy?"

Who controls the house in question, and who pays the costs associated with that control over that house in any case whatsoever?

If you prefer to think in terms of "ownership", which to me is a can of worms filled with lies, a web of deceit, a dragon, falsehood, but none-the-less a high demand item, "ownership" IS demanded, and therefore there is a supply produced to meed that demand for "ownership", so we can agree, to our mutual benefit, to think in terms of "ownership", instead of "control", then, OK, let's go down that rabbit hole, and we can, if possible, compare, competitively, later, how the "ownership" perspective, compares to the "control" perspective.

Question again:

"We are in a break from the monopoly at the moment. I have a question...is it equitable to skip rent if the owner does not notice occupancy?"

The owner is who?

If a small group of people existing behind a lie called the "Nation" OWN all the land they claim to own, and they extract all the POWER from everyone on that land, who, if you will please inform me, OWNS the property in question?

Your "ownership" perspective, if that is what you want to use in this case, is falling apart, is it not?

Is it a matter of "our" mutual benefit for "us" to ignore the few people behind a lie called the "Nation" with the "National Interest" in this case, or any other case, involving this concept of "ownership"?

If access to power is made scarce, by someone, then someone else may be inspired to do anything to survive when that power is no longer available without "paying the price" demanded.

When the power supply is X on this day, and when the power supply is used to increase the power supply, as a matter of accurately measurable fact, the power supply is greater than, not less than, X.

How is that FACT hidden, in FACT, so as to inspire actual people to do just about anything, pay any price, to gain access to the POWER required to survive?

I don't know?

Really?

Back to the question:

"We are in a break from the monopoly at the moment. I have a question...is it equitable to skip rent if the owner does not notice occupancy?"

Those who have stolen the POWER to steal POWER, in a phrase "provide the means by which we suffer", and in another phrase "federal income tax liabilities", OWN their victims now.

You can all it ownership, if that works for you.

I call it control.

We are demanding from each other RENT at a price that distributes the scarce supply of POWER inequitably, because that is our decision to do so, when that is our decision to do so, and all that nonsense evaporates when X is used to make more X in time, when POWER is allowed to be abundant, instead of POWER being made scarce, on purpose, for fun and profit, of a few, at the expense of many.

You, Bear (bear), follow this, and I think that Fonta (fonta) does too, it is not within my POWER to know, so I'm guessing, and it is past time to fight each other over the last crumb of bread.

It is time to know this:

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

It is time to know this:

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amend...

_____________________________________

Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
______________________________________

Know this:

http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm

"Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built upon the ruins of the bowers of paradise."

Know too that even that is only half true, since X, the POWER SUPPLY, can increase to a point of abundance, whereby the choice between Evil A or Evil B is no longer in demand, at all, and instead the former victims have before them, us, higher quality and lower cost choice A, or even higher quality and even lower cost choice B, because that becomes our choices as we work to make that our choices instead of being OWNED by our falsehoods that exist because we allow them to exist.

Know this:

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."
Henry Ford

Can that be known, owned, employed, used, understood, acted upon, realized, to our mutual benefit?

Yes, no, maybe, or hey, how about this for an idea, how about joining them, since we can't beat em?

Joe