The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Free Market does not mean fraud
Free Market does not mean fraud
Companies should not be allowed to DECEIVE consumers.
There is no legitimate reason for anybody to sell a product to somebody that has something harmful in it, and hide the fact that there is something harmful in the product. In a free market, consumers make the decision what succeeds and fails, but the consumers have the right to make an informed decision.
It is very clear that the reason these companies do not want to have to put this label on their products, is because they KNOW that they will lose some of their business if people know what it is that they are buying. In other words, these companies want to be allowed to dupe consumers into buying something that they would not want to buy. That is fraud, and it IS a libertarian position to oppose fraud.
Also, I don't feel it is a responsibility of the consumers to have to make these demands on the companies. If you secretly stick a poison in something you know somebody is going to consume, without telling them, that should be a crime in itself. Just because the consumer "didn't specifically ask" doesn't make it OK to poison him.
Replies to this comment: