















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Baggage is NOT why Republicans lost again.
Baggage is NOT why Republicans lost again.
Republicans lost again because the Republican establishment forced a liberal Republican on the electorate, thereby driving down Conservative turnout. Plus, Romney let Obama set the tempo, mainly because he didn't know how to defend the free market. Take the Lilly Ledbetter Act for instance. Obama gave women the impression that Romney would repeal it which would then open here door to massive discrimination agains women. Romney ran from he issue because he didn't know how to counter that. If he supported the LLA, then he in essence would be showing Conservatives that there really is no difference between him and Obama. If he opposed it, it would be political suicide.
An articulate, knowledgeable, fiscal Conservative would know to explain how laws like the LLA actually hurt women by causing male employers to avoid hiring women for fear of being hit with a lawsuit. It may help some women currently in the workforce, but, it indirectly keeps unemployed women and future women out of the professional workforce. "Baggage" is irrelevant if the Republican Party will learn Economics 101.
Replies to this comment: