back in the 60's or 70's when all's gay people wanted was to have the same insurance benefits, tax breaks, and inheritance protection straight couples had "marriage" (as defined by Big Gov't) would not be on the table.
Basically you "allow" two consenting adults to enter into a contract with each other and that you don't give "un-fair" advantages to ANYONE (married couples).
The other soultion would have been to eliminate all advantages to being married (tax breaks, insurance, inheritance, beneficiary etc).
But THAT type of thinking would require an understanding of how a court system would work in a "free-society" instead of the unionized "force-agency" system we have now.
That's why gays unionized and are now winning elections -- because people like you started this particular "groupist war"
*&^ Constitution --- Constitutional Rationality
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: