Comment: I haven't redefined anything.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Enlightenment (see in situ)

I haven't redefined anything.

I haven't redefined anything. You just don't like the fact that words have definitions.

Anarchy: "a state of society without government or law."

Anarchism :"a doctrine urging the abolition of government or governmental restraint as the indispensable condition for full social and political liberty."

Anarchist: "a person who advocates or believes in anarchy or anarchism."

Anarchists think they get liberty with the abolishment of government restraint, but what they get is chaos. What they do is unleash the nature they need to pretend doesn't exit.

I get it, you think you're a good man. Good men do exist. If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't care. I'd just watch as you get destroyed. But you're also naive if you can look around and think you'll get "liberty" when removing government restraint.

'There was no legislature, no bailiffs, no police, no public enforcement of justiceÉ. There was no trace of State-administered justice.'

I don't recognize your kangaroo courts "Brehon", and since you have no legislature, police, or public enforcement of justice, I should have no problem ganging people up and destroying those who exalted themselves, those who thought they were going lord over me with violence in a system in which I have no representation or association.

You want to see how bad things can get, that's fine.

Anarchists get beat in the street like dogs for a reason, for running their mouths, mocking everything and everyone, denigrating people of faith and calling anybody who didn't agree with them "sheep" and retards.

Bring on your "justice" Anarchist.