















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: I would love to
I would love to
see them try to round up 500,000+ people (many of them armed I am sure) without putting the rest of the country in a complete state of panic...they can try that to their own detriment. We've been snooped on for so long now, that most of these people probably already have theirs names on a number of unlawful lists already....
Also, your statement "who can be legally detained indefinitely as enemies of the state in case of unrest" is not quite accurate. Just because you write something down on paper, doesn't automatically make it "legal" or acceptable. The provision of the NDAA that allows for Americans to be rounded up and corralled without due process has already been ruled unconstitutional, therefore, technically, it is not "legal" for them at all to do it. Let's not classify their tyrannical rules as "legal", when the truth of the matter is it is well established that any law which violates any provision of the Constitution is void and has no legal effect at all (and it was SCOTUS themselves who declared it).
Replies to this comment: