Comment: ----------------- "What

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: More important questions? (see in situ)

----------------- "What

-----------------
"What happens when the the same law that is to be claimed for protection is the law that is causing the injury?"

The law does not change, so your question is too ambiguous to be of any use, but your intention is still honest and genuine, so the question can, perhaps, be rephrased?

Which law, specifically, turns from Liberty to Crime?
-----------------
This one:

AMENDMENT XIV

Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
_________________________________________________

It was my intent that my list of questions were to build upon one another. They were not stand alone. They were questions telling a story, that when arriving at the last question one could perhaps have an answer. Perhaps a poetic work of art in the form of questions.

...