Comment: I agree

(See in situ)

I agree

with your second and third sentences. Romney and Obama as individuals are irrelevant. Their role as pawns is seen in the bigger picture. As pawns, they have individual powers they developed on their own (the pawns may be "groomed"); this allows them to play. If the overall plan was to have Obama win, each would use the power they have as tools to further that end. These pawns are on the same side. The election is just a small game within a game. A small distraction from the main game, to let the sheeple know who will be in charge for the next turn, and, perhaps, generate a statistic for the PTB to peruse over coffee, maybe a nice colorful pie chart. I really expected a better show this time, with all the buildup. I'm disappointed. I may not even tune in next time. :)

Just open the box and see