Comment: The first CON CON was a CON JOB

(See in situ)


The first CON CON was a CON JOB

Know your history, sending stupid people to do criminal acts for high pay is not a good idea, because YOU get the bill.

http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Proceedings-Debates-Constitutio...

http://teachingamericanhistory.org/ratification/virginiatime...

http://www.wfu.edu/~zulick/340/henry.html

"I rose yesterday to ask a question which arose in my own mind. When I asked that question, I thought the meaning of my interrogation was obvious. The fate of this question and of America may depend on this. Have they said, We, the states? Have they made a proposal of a compact between states? If they had, this would be a confederation. It is otherwise most clearly a consolidated government."

If whomever you are lending moral and material support is thereby empowered to act, and will act, to seal your fate into absolute despotism, pretending to be your friend, then it may be a good idea to stop lending that moral and material support.

If on the other hand you are investing in honest money, then you will be a part of the POWER that Ends the FED.

If you are no longer going to "provide the means by which you suffer" you will, somehow, End the IRS.

If those criminals then invade your country you had better have your troops home because you will need them.

Con Con was a Con Job the first time, those who expect to improve their situation with another Con Con Con Job are lunatics.

If your representative says that they will End the FED, End the IRS, and bring the Troops Home, they may be lying, so what ensures the reaching of those necessary goals?

End the FED by inventing, producing, and maintaining competitive Legal Money, at the local level, the State level , or Country level, if it is competitive then there will be a choice to use brand x or brand y, and all those choices made by all those people choosing will be the voluntary FORCE that FORCES the producers of Legal Money to improve quality and lower cost, or lose market share.

If you can't see that, then you are in no condition to be sending a representative to any legal proceeding of any kind, let alone sit on a jury to judge anyone who may, as a matter of fact, be refusing to send any more of their hard earned surplus wealth to a criminal gang called the IRS.

If the idea is to End the IRS, in your State, and thereby return your State to a Sovereign Legal Entity, instead of an Incorporated part of the Consolidated Government, then stop paying the extortion fee somehow, and do so legally, since the actual LAW forcing you to pay Federal Income Tax does not exist, as already proven in so many court cases where the Juries knew enough to demand the pertinent evidence that could inculpate the presumed to be innocent defendant NO LAW EXISTS.

Your enemies of Liberty may be your neighbor, due to ignorance.

Your peers, unfortunately, are fools.

You want them to be sent to a Con Con?

To do what?

End the FED?

End the IRS?

Bring the troops home?

Write a better Constitution?

The first one was so full of holes the actual Friends of Liberty of the day protested against it, leading to the Bill of Rights.

If the criminals do not abide by the Constitution as it exists, what makes you think that the criminals are going to abide by a new piece of paper signed by a bunch of fools or criminals?

Change?

Out with the old boss, in with the new boss, all criminals?

Some know they are criminals and others are clueless criminals?

If you want to bring the troops home, stop dressing them up in uniforms made in China and sending them to be used by the criminals.

How is that for a fresh start?

Joe