Comment: Exactly. His entire argument is fallacious

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Anarchist... (see in situ)

Exactly. His entire argument is fallacious

His entire intellectual argument is based around the assumption that Ron Paul - and his supporters - are anarchists.

This is false on the face of it.

Ron Paul is not an anarchist. Period.

Neither am I. And - other than a somewhat vocal minority here on the site and others like it - neither are his supporters.

Also:

The 'not so subtle' tone of the article, which implies that Ron Paul supporters - as a rule - are foolish hero-worshipping do-nothings mindlessly following a misguided charlatan to their own doom lol ..

Yeah. Caught that. Hilarious imo. Bitter much?