The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Sure.
Sure.
I never disputed that it would "stop" an average attacker, I'm disputing its lethality. Seriously, even a normal .44 won't do anything against Kevlar except hurt really badly - only a rifle or a specialized pistol round (7.62 Tokarev, for instance) could pierce it.
You target center body mass, not the head. Center body mass provides an abundance of vital organs to hit, and it's a much larger target. Headshots are hard anyway, and darn near impossible on a moving target. Average intruder breaks in and gets shot with a 9mm hollow point, average intruder will either die or end up in critical condition in the nearest hospital.
I've seen some of that show, and yes, a .22 out of a 20 inch barrel at point blank range to the back of the brain is indeed reliably lethal. A .22 out of a five-inch barrel at seven feet shooting at a moving torso, possibly through thick clothing?
I'm not saying that the .22 is useless - on the contrary, no prepper should be without one. I'm simply stating that larger calibers that can be easily handled by the shooter will be more reliably lethal than a .22LR ever stands a chance of being.
Replies to this comment: