Comment: Dust cloud

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: You should have watched more, (see in situ)

Dust cloud

Yeah, but even her theory about the dust cloud from the controlled demolition from a building not going more than half the height... yes, that is the case when it is a controlled demolition, where the building is exploded at the bottom... the world trade center had planes hit the tops of the buildings... the dust cloud started at the top, and was also carried higher by the flames... there are no flames in a controlled demolition... it is great to get these experts on there who ignore FACTS!! And their graphic of how high the debris should be piled was truly laughable... buildings are mostly empty space... otherwise there would be no room for furniture in them! It is not a pyramid composed of solid rock, that if blasted would form a huge pile. OMG, these arguments are just like arguing against Romney and Obama.... educate, educate, educate... explain, explain, explain... it is so rewarding to hear from the few people that understand basic physics.

His show would be better if he followed the trail of perpetrators of 9/11. We know why the buildings came down... friggin planes rammed into it loaded with fuel... double duh! It is like hitting a nail into a board with a hammer, and then trying to come up with theories as how the nail got into the board!!!!! Why doesn't he research who used the hammer???

The really scary thing is all the down votes that I got on my original comment... ha ha ha... boooooo booooo how dare you talk about facts and details... really scary to see that the people that would down vote are part of the DailyPaul... these are the people that discredit the Ron Paul movement and make us seem like kooks and crazies.