Comment: "there is no single agreed-upon definition for anarchism"

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Actually, there is no single (see in situ)

"there is no single agreed-upon definition for anarchism"

"Since they can't agree on anything EXCEPT removal of the state"

"Anarchy": 1. a state of society without government or law.
2. political and social disorder due to the absence of governmental control: The death of the king was followed by a year of anarchy. Synonyms: lawlessness, disruption, turmoil.
3. anarchism ( def. 1 ) .
4. lack of obedience to an authority; insubordination: the anarchy of his rebellious teenage years.
5. confusion and disorder: Intellectual and moral anarchy followed his loss of faith.

"Anarchism": 1. a doctrine urging the abolition of government or governmental restraint as the indispensable condition for full social and political liberty.
2. the methods or practices of anarchists, as the use of violence to undermine government.
3. anarchy.

"Anarchist": 1. a person who advocates or believes in anarchy or anarchism.
2.a person who seeks to overturn by violence all constituted forms and institutions of society and government, with no purpose of establishing any other system of order in the place of that destroyed.
3.a person who promotes disorder or excites revolt against any established rule, law, or custom.

--- Like I said, the first books an Anarchist will burn are the dictionaries. They're Judas Goats and liars trying to masquerade as Libertarians because they know nobody can stand them. There's a reason you can't get your social movement going, because the only place an Anarchists (bowel) movement belongs is the toilet.

I have no problem with these definitions. You're the walking embodiment of those definitions. That definition describes every Anarchist who's ever tried to open their mouth at me and call themselves a Libertarian.

THEY CAN'T EXPLAIN THEMSELVES FOR A REASON.