I know it is not wise trying to argue with someone who already has their mind made up and who, like the official government idiot response, chooses the LEAST likely hypothesis, as opposed to the MOST likely one to explain the destruction of the towers, but here goes:
And by the way the burden of proof is on the fantasy-creators at NIST and FEMA, not us.
Res ipsa loquitur, Fireant.
There is so much ABUNDANT evidence for controlled demolition, that it is SELF-EVIDENT and if you can't see it for yourself then I am sorry there DEFINITELY is no hope for you.
You either let the evidence speak for itself and quit trying to force your uninformed opinion on it...or you join the ranks of other retards with their heads in the sand on this very VERY grave, important issue of the events of 9-11.
Once scenario how the buildings were rigged. Watch this short mini-documentary here:
Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: