Comment: TRUE.

(See in situ)

sharkhearted's picture


My mind is certainly made up on the controlled demolition hypothesis. Why?

Because it is true.

Because the evidence is so SELF-EVIDENT even a child can figure it out.

Because there is enough evidence to try and win this case in a fair court of law with thousands of expert witnesses (scientists, engineers, physicists, demolitions experts) ready to swear under oath of the veracity of their research and claims that the towers could have ONLY been completely destroyed by controlled demolition.

However, I would say that there is certainly NO abundance of evidence of controlled demolition... someone who has his head in the sand like an ostrich.

Not to worry, Mr. Ostrich, the evidence is overwhelming and obvious and incontrovertible and it speaks for itself, no matter how much you want to ignore it.

Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.