Comment: The structural damage was

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: All those questions he asked (see in situ)

The structural damage was

The structural damage was just superficial. No damage to the core support columns, and definitely no airplane. So it basically comes down to the fire. I don't know, and don't pretend to know what happened that day. There's just not enough evidence to support either side of the argument. Had a proper investigation been conducted, maybe we would have answers. But WTC #7 was not investigated. It was not even mentioned in the 911 commission report. It sounds like you are a little too quick to take sides on this one.

an idea whose time has come cannot be stopped by any army or any government