Home

Comment: The structural damage was

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: All those questions he asked (see in situ)

The structural damage was

Submitted by tarzip86 on Mon, 11/19/2012 - 02:48.

The structural damage was just superficial. No damage to the core support columns, and definitely no airplane. So it basically comes down to the fire. I don't know, and don't pretend to know what happened that day. There's just not enough evidence to support either side of the argument. Had a proper investigation been conducted, maybe we would have answers. But WTC #7 was not investigated. It was not even mentioned in the 911 commission report. It sounds like you are a little too quick to take sides on this one.

—

an idea whose time has come cannot be stopped by any army or any government