Comment: I understand. But saying

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Creator-Given Rights (age unknown) (see in situ)

I understand. But saying

I understand. But saying "creator" begins debate on what is a private issue. Creator is God? Creator is Allah? Creator is Yahweh? Creator is mom and dad, so creators? See what I mean? The insertion of creator is nothing but divisive and cause for spats and quibbles, wastes of time and effort, things to not engage in, to avoid.

That's why I ask, why go that route, why even spend time on what someone puts his mind to when it affects him only, that is, when that issue is personal (read: of the person)?

My goal in this language riddle is to keep personal what is personal instead of making social what is personal. To do that retains the integrity of what is personal AND what is social. I want to locate then use the language that satisfies what's intrinsic, ensuring satisfaction for everyone in the given society.

School's fine. Just don't let it get in the way of thinking. -Me

Study nature, not books. -Walton Forest Dutton, MD, in his 1916 book whose subject is origin (therefore what all healing methods involve and count on), simple and powerful.