It's such a crazy piece of this story. Wasn't the PBS interview like a year after 9/11? How could he say something like that? It's almost too ridiculous to think it's a cover up. But the fact that it's never been acknowledged as such means things just don't add up. Was this really the shocking blunder that it seems? It's hard to fathom but it's also hard to explain it in any other way.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Dai