















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: What is better?
What is better?
Low taxes or a balanced budget? I know that many of us would argue that we can have both: a small government and minimal taxes. The problem is we haven't convinced others of this yet. If Republicans insist on low taxes for everybody (which will probably mean more deficits), then they will be helping to conceal the true cost of government from our people. Let taxes raise to the level where revenue matches our expenditures, and you'll see a whole new group of people interested in making serious reductions to the size of government. I've said if before, and I'll say it again. We can insist on no tax increases ever, or we can insist on balanced budgets, but we're not going to get both, at least not soon. If the GOP uses deficits to maintain current tax rates, then they are short-circuiting the liberty and limited government movement. Forcing this nation to pay up front for every domestic program and military misadventure would make the benefits of liberty obvious to a whole new group of people.
"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds."-Samuel Adams
http://brushfiresinthemind.blogspot.com/
Replies to this comment: