Comment: Why Occupy Wall Street never caught on.

(See in situ)


Why Occupy Wall Street never caught on.

Because nobody wanted to admit, even to themselves, that they weren't in the top 1%.

Anybody remember the old line from the Prairie Home Companion?

"Where the women are strong, the men are good looking and the children are all above average."

Its comedy - but NOBODY ever wants to think that they are anything but superior.

Back when I was learning to do Social Research in college - I was taught that when you ask for information in a survey - you should always include a category under "Income" that nobody will likely use. For instance "Total Household Income - $0 - $10,000".

NOBODY with a real household has income between $0 and $10,000, but if you don't put that category in and instead start with say "$20,000 to $50,000" people will lie and bump themsleves up a category because nobody wants to think of themselves as the lowest. Your results will come back skewed that EVERYBODY makes more than $50,000 and your data will be garbage.

Likewise, when we heard of Occupy Wall Street - the tendency was to bump ourselves up and into the 1% and figure "Those people want to take something AWAY from me!" The organizers did their best to advertise "WE are the 99%" but most people weren't buying it. They really wanted to consider themselves in the 1% and therefore to side WITH the 1% and against those dirty people on the street.

But the fact is that the 1% make $344,000 per year and I doubt that ANY of us here do. Certainly none of us want to admit we don't.*

I had an argument in this very forum with some guy a couple weeks ago - who clearly considered himself to be one of the 1%. He bragged that he made $165,000 per year.

Thats fine. Maybe he did. But even DOUBLE that income wouldn't have put him in the top 1%

So stop thinking of the bottom 99% as skum. There is a 99% chance that YOU are ONE OF US.

Correction: Since there are at times 300 to 500 people active on this website, assuming that a fair distribution of income is represented by our number (and I have no information that suggests otherwise) - then there my be 3 to 5 people here who ARE in the top 1% out of 300 to 500. Thats according to what the definition of "1%" is. But it certainly is still not the majority.