"The Constitution is our founding document that defines and constricts the role of Government."
That is patently false, and therefore the essay is not an essay, if words mean anything, since that very first sentence measures up this "essay" as just another false advertizement for crimes made legal.
That places you, the author, into at least two possible catagories as such:
Just another criminal who uses the concept of a limited government to cover up your crimes.
I can explain in great detail, but who would listen?
A dupe does not want to listen, and I've just heard a new term on one of the many forms of communication currently flowing through our network of human existence, and that term is Sharonite.
Look it up, because we are all being duped, or a part of the crime spree in progress, and it is past time to know better.
"It was created primarily to prevent the errors of tyrannical monarchism and pure democracy and to protect the natural rights of man, chief among these being the right to life, liberty, and property."
Again, more falsehood, since the actual facts concerning the actual people involved, such as Alexander Hamilton, in particular, were creating a Monarchy with the Secret Meetings and Proceedings that occurred in Philadelphia where THE constitution was the result of that conspiracy.
This is not theory, since those who were there, published those facts occurring there, despite the gag order placed on those who attended, and you can read the "news" yourself if you cared to do so, before you continue with this democracy spreading, or whatever it is you are doing with this "essay".
Constructive critical review would not be complete without at least a minor effort to offer competitive sentences in place of those false ones.
It seems to me.
A limited constitutional government system can be employed by moral people to help in the necessary work required to defend against those people who seek to enslave other people.
That isn't what you want to do, so the sentence does not work for you? So what is the point of regurgitating the lies that helped the criminals destroy Liberty in this country?
I don't know.
Many competitive constitutional governments worked under The Articles of Confederation before the criminals took over with the usurpation that is now continuing to cover up the crimes of a few very evil people under the false title of The Constitution.
That would lead into a few more sentences concerning the drastic, actually opposite, intentions that the two groups had when those two groups fought for control over the power of government in those days, where on one side were those people exemplified by Patrick Henry and Daniel Shays and on the other side were those Monarchists hiding behind their false front of "Federalism" such as Alexander Hamilton and the useful idiot James Madison.
But those things are not known to you, for some reason.
You may have guessed, in your travels to date, that some things are kept out of circulation for good reason, according to those who expend the effort required to keep accurate information scarce, with such things as gag orders - for one example.
"It was created to redress the grievances that so greatly compelled our Founding Fathers to declare independence from Great Britain."
Here again your "history" is completely off the mark, almost exactly opposite of the truth, and those who know better fall into 2 general categories.
Those who think their crimes are better hidden because yet again there exists another example of a well trained dupe spreading the lies that cover up the crimes that perpetuate because of those lies being so well embraced by so many dupes. Such a person probably smiles confidently when reading your false versions of the actual facts.
Those who think that there is a whole lot more work to do in defense of liberty, since, measurably, there are still so many dupes who are still so very well duped. Those who may be set aback by the mounting evidence that good people are very seriously threatened by such profuse belief in falsehoods, but are determined to continue soldiering on in the fight against abject belief, and obedience to, falsehood, without question, or challenge.
The Articles of Confederation worked to help combine the defensive POWER of many separate and sovereign constitutionally limited, free market experimental governments, to drive the largest occupying army of aggression then existing on the planet earth out of this country.
So the obvious question asked, by people such as Patrick Henry, was to ask why someone, some group, were working so hard to get rid of a working Democratic Federated Republic, and to replace it, through a false advertizement campaign, financed by monarchists, with a Consolidated government or Monopoly Nation State?
But no such question exists, so far, in your "essay".
I've run out of time, so far, in meeting the demand requested by the OP.
I hope that you all have a beautiful day while we still can.