Comment: bump...

(See in situ)


bump...

to offset yet another negative vote on the article itself which as usual, was NOT accompanied with any explanation, argument, or heaven forbid, anything of substance in an attempt to communicate any possible rationale behind it.

If the intent of the DailyPaul is truly to promote truth, regardless of how unpopular it may be at times, then it would seem better served if from now on, a minimum "two word" explanation were required on all negative votes. This would also serve to help keep things more on the up and up.