The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Here's another take on it...
Here's another take on it...
This is a difficult and divisive issue... but here's another way to look at it. The woman's so called "right to choose" what she does with her own body needs to be examined under the light of the fact that with a fetus, it is NOT entirely her body anymore. Last time I checked, part of a man's body is required to create a fetus, so if she has a clump of cells in her uterus, half of those cells belong to the man!!!! Seriously, why are men such friggin wimps that they can't even stick up for THEIR body, their cells that are growing inside the woman.
Sorry, but when a woman lays with a man with unprotected sex, she knowingly accepts the man's property into her body, so at the VERY least the father's permission should be required for an abortion. That's at least a start...
Replies to this comment: