The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: I'm pretty sure..
I'm pretty sure..
that in 1973 we fully understood the process of sperm and egg joining, going through division, etc. I was in high school, I'm old, but damn! That wasn't the dark ages, lol.
All that stuff IS scientific, but I don't agree that science says that "life begins at conception" in the context of this debate. That seems like a misleading statement to me.
'Cause there's a monster on the loose